Thursday, 26 November 2020
logo
Up-to-the-minute perspectives on defence, security and peace
issues from and for policy makers and opinion leaders.
        



dv-header-dday
     |      View our Twitter page at twitter.com/defenceredbox     |     

By Tony Purton

After declining to take part in any public debate on the subject, defence secretary Des Browne appeared before the Defence Committee of the House of Commons to give evidence on the government's white paper "The Future of the UK's Strategic Nuclear Deterrent" published at the end of 2006 announcing the government's decision to replace the existing Trident system with another submarine-based system.

Mr Browne made it clear that the white paper was intended to 'inform the public' about the government's decision rather that to invite debate; he said that decisions about the existing nuclear deterrent had not been publicly debated. Provision would be made for discussion of the white paper in the Commons in March.

Britain's nuclear deterrent is not designed to be used tactically alongside conventional weapons. It would only be used in self defence as an alternative to conventional weapons. First use was not ruled out as part of an effective deterrent posture. Britain has only 1% of the world total of nuclear warheads. There is no known intent or capability of a nuclear threat against the UK today, but nobody can be sure how the world will develop over the next 50 years. The Trident replacement system would not be funded at the expense of conventional forces.

At the end of the session, Defence Committee chairman James Arbuthnot MP remarked that Britain's nuclear deterrent was not so much a shield as a sword!

The debate on Trident replacement took place on 14 March resulting in overwhelming Parliamentary support for the government's proposal, despite a significant rebellion among Labour back-benchers.

Tony Purton is the Westminster Correspondent of Great North News Services

Cookies
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies on the Defence Viewpoints website. However, if you would like to, you can modify your browser so that it notifies you when cookies are sent to it or you can refuse cookies altogether. You can also delete cookies that have already been set. You may wish to visit www.aboutcookies.org which contains comprehensive information on how to do this on a wide variety of desktop browsers. Please note that you will lose some features and functionality on this website if you choose to disable cookies. For example, you may not be able to link into our Twitter feed, which gives up to the minute perspectives on defence and security matters.