Monday, 21 September 2026
logo
Up-to-the-minute perspectives on defence, security and peace
issues from and for policy makers and opinion leaders.
        



dv-header-dday
     |      View our Twitter page at twitter.com/defenceredbox     |     

By Jeffrey Bradford, our North America correspondent

The UK media has been angsting about the role of peers as consultants recently and the possibility that people might actually be able to exercise an opportunity to speak with, inform and possibly lobby the odd legislator.

The Wall Street Journal yesterday published the results of the latest data on lobbying spend submitted to Congress by the biggest US contractors. The league table for 2008 reads;

Northrop Grumman (NYSE:NOC) $20.6m ($10.9m in 2007)


Boeing (NYSE:BA) $16.6m ($10.6m in 2007)

Lockheed Martin (NYSE:LMT) $15.4m ($10m in 2007)

General Dynamics (NYSE:GD) $8.5m ($7m in 2007)

Raytheon (NYSE:RTN) $6.0m ($6.5m in 2007)

BAE Systems (London:BA) $4.2m ($1.0m in 2007)

* For all the vilification of BAE Systems lobbying efforts in the UK it seems quite apparent that they are having to play 'catch-up' in the North American market.

* Northrop Grumman & Boeing efforts are probably increased due to the intense dogfight over the aerial tanker program in 2008.

* Lockheed Martin is probably focused on the F-22 production line and ensuring Joint Strike Fighter (JSF) - the single largest new procurement program in the US defense budget can make it through a change of Administration unscathed...

Cookies
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies on the Defence Viewpoints website. However, if you would like to, you can modify your browser so that it notifies you when cookies are sent to it or you can refuse cookies altogether. You can also delete cookies that have already been set. You may wish to visit www.aboutcookies.org which contains comprehensive information on how to do this on a wide variety of desktop browsers. Please note that you will lose some features and functionality on this website if you choose to disable cookies. For example, you may not be able to link into our Twitter feed, which gives up to the minute perspectives on defence and security matters.